Nursing 2019-2020

STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

Intended OutcomesMeans of AssessmentCriteria for SuccessSummary & Analysis of Assessment EvidenceUse of Results
SLO 1: Human Flourishing: Advocate for patients and families in ways that promote their self-determination, integrity, and ongoing growth as human beings.

Evaluation 1: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool

Eval 1: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 1.0 (Human Flourishing) of the clinical evaluation tool
















NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool

Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 1.6 (Human Flourishing) of the clinical evaluation tool

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27(100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39(100%)






Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19): In Spring 2019, instructors revised the SPE to reflect the new concept-based student learning outcomes.

Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20):The NUR 221 faculty met and finalized the tracking schedule and the methods of assessment to be utilized when evaluating each EPSLOs which is reflected in this report.
SLO 2: Patient Centered:
Recognize the patient or designee as the source of control and full partner in providing compassionate and coordinated care based on respect for patient’s preferences, value, and needs.
Evaluation 2: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation ToolEval 2: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 1.0 (Patient Centered) of the clinical evaluation tool












NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool – Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 1.0 (Patient Centered Care) of the clinical evaluation tool

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)













Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Members of the NUR 221 Course team discussed use of rubrics to provide consistency in evaluating student work.


Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 3: Nursing Judgement:
Make judgements in practice, substantiated with evidence, that integrate nursing science in the provision of safe, quality care and that promote care and that promote the health of patient within the family and community context.
Evaluation 3: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool






























Eval 3: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 2.0 (Nursing Judgement) of the clinical evaluation tool.


























NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool – Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 2.0 (Nursing Judgement) of the clinical evaluation tool

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)





Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Discussed criteria to measure each EPSLO.

Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 4: Safety: Minimize risk of harm to patients and providers through both system effectiveness and individual performance.



Evaluation 4: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool






























Eval 4: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on critical behaviors 1, 2, and 8 (Safety) of the clinical evaluation tool.




















NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool – Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on critical behaviors 1, 2, and 8 (Safety) of the clinical evaluation tool

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)








Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
The NUR 221 Course Team decided to utilize the math test as a means of measuring safety (EPSLO).

Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 5: Informatics: Use informatics and technology to communicate, manage knowledge, mitigate error, and support decision making.
Evaluation 5: NUR 221 Docu-Care Assignments. (Blackboard Gradebook)






















Eval 5: 80% of students, will achieve a passing score of 2 on all Docu-Care assignments using the Docu-Care grading rubric.



























NUR 221 DocuCare Assignment - Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a passing score of 2 on all DocuCare assignments using the DocuCare grading rubric.

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20(100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)






Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Students preferred Docu-Care over Prep U for use in the clinical setting as a form of electronic documentation.

Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 6: Professional Identity: Implement one’s role as a nurse in ways that reflect integrity, responsibility, ethical practices, and an evolving identity as a nurse committed to evidence-based practice, caring, advocacy, and safe, quality care for diverse patients within a family and community context.
Evaluation 6: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool






















Eval 6: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 3.0 (Professional Identity) of the clinical evaluation tool.



















NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool - Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 3.0 (Professional Identity) of the clinical evaluation tool.

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36(100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20(100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)





Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Discussed criteria to measure each EPSLO.

Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 7:Teamwork/Collaboration: Function effectively within nursing and inter-professional teams, fostering open communication mutual respect, and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient care.
Evaluation 7: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool



















Eval 7: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 3.0 (Professional Identity) of the clinical evaluation tool.















NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool - Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 3.0 (Professional Identity) of the clinical evaluation tool.

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)





Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Discussed criteria to measure each EPSLO.

Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20):No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 8: Spirit of Inquiry: Examine the evidence that underlies clinical nursing practice to challenge the status quo, questions underlying assumptions, and offer new insights to improve the quality of care for patients, families, and communities.

Evaluation 8: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool





Eval 8: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 4.0 (Spirit of Inquiry) of the clinical evaluation tool.





NUR 221`Clinical Evaluation Tool - Aggregate: 241/241 -100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 4.0 (Spirit of Inquiry) of the clinical evaluation.


Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)





Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Discussed criteria to measure each EPSLO.


Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 9: Evidence-Based Practice: Integrate best current evidence with clinical expertise and patient/family preferences and values for delivery of optimal health care.
Evaluation 9: NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool
Eval 9: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 4.0 (Spirit of Inquiry) of the clinical evaluation tool.

NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool – Aggregate: 241/241 = 100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 4.0 (Spirit of Inquiry) of the clinical evaluation tool.


Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24(100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)








Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Discussed criteria to measure each EPSLO.


Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.
SLO 10: Quality Improvement: Use data to monitor the outcomes of care processes ad use improvement methods to design and test changes to continuously improve the quality and safety of health care systems.
Evaluation 10: NUR 221 clinical Evaluation Tool











Eval 10: 95% of graduating students will achieve a summative passing grade on section 4.0 (Spirit of Inquiry) of the clinical evaluation tool.

NUR 221 Clinical Evaluation Tool - Aggregate: 241/241 = 100% of graduating students achieved a summative passing grade on section 4.0 (Spirit of Inquiry) of the clinical evaluation tool.

Fall 2019
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 19/19 (100%)

Spring 2020
Jefferson: 15/15 (100%)
Shelby: 36/36 (100%)
Evening: 37/37 (100%)
Pell City: 20/20 (100%)
Clanton: 27/27 (100%)

Summer 2020
Jefferson: 24/24 (100%)
Shelby: 39/39 (100%)




Observations/Changes based on previous cycle (18-19):
Discussed criteria to measure each EPSLO.

Observations/Changes based on current cycle (19-20): No areas identified as needing development. Instructors will continue to evaluate results.